Aws lambda python rds token not accepted as password

When working with AWS Lambda and RDS in Python, you may encounter an issue where the RDS token is not accepted as a password. This can be frustrating, but fortunately, there are several ways to solve this problem.

Solution 1: Using the AWS Secrets Manager

One way to solve this issue is by using the AWS Secrets Manager. This service allows you to securely store and manage secrets such as database credentials. Here’s how you can use it:


import boto3

def get_db_password():
    secret_name = "your-secret-name"
    region_name = "your-region-name"

    session = boto3.session.Session()
    client = session.client(service_name='secretsmanager', region_name=region_name)

    response = client.get_secret_value(SecretId=secret_name)
    secret = response['SecretString']

    return secret['password']

In this solution, you need to create a secret in the AWS Secrets Manager with the necessary database credentials. Then, you can retrieve the password using the get_secret_value method and use it in your Lambda function.

Solution 2: Using environment variables

Another way to solve this issue is by using environment variables. Here’s how you can do it:


import os

def get_db_password():
    return os.environ.get('DB_PASSWORD')

In this solution, you need to set the environment variable DB_PASSWORD with the database password. Then, you can retrieve it using the os.environ.get method in your Lambda function.

Solution 3: Using a configuration file

Alternatively, you can store the database password in a configuration file. Here’s an example:


import configparser

def get_db_password():
    config = configparser.ConfigParser()
    config.read('config.ini')

    return config['database']['password']

In this solution, you need to create a configuration file (e.g., config.ini) with the necessary database credentials. Then, you can use the configparser module to read the file and retrieve the password.

After considering these three solutions, the best option depends on your specific use case. If you are already using the AWS Secrets Manager, Solution 1 may be the most convenient. If you prefer managing secrets through environment variables, Solution 2 is a good choice. On the other hand, if you have a more complex configuration or want to keep all your credentials in a separate file, Solution 3 might be the most suitable.

Ultimately, the choice depends on your preferences and the requirements of your project. It’s important to consider factors such as security, ease of management, and scalability when deciding which solution to implement.

Rate this post

6 Responses

    1. I respectfully disagree. While Solution 2 may appear simple, it lacks the depth and innovation of Solution 1. Sometimes, its worth pushing boundaries and exploring new possibilities. Lets aim for excellence, not just simplicity. 💪🏼

    1. I completely disagree! Solution 2 is the way to go. Its straightforward and efficient. Solution 3 might offer some flexibility, but it also brings unnecessary complexity. I think we should keep it simple and stick with Solution 2.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Table of Contents