Building python from source with zlib support

Building Python from source with zlib support can be a useful task for developers who want to ensure that their Python installation includes support for the zlib compression library. In this article, we will explore three different ways to solve this problem.

Option 1: Using the configure script

The first option involves using the configure script that comes with the Python source code. This script allows you to customize various aspects of the build process, including enabling zlib support.

./configure --with-zlib

This command will configure the build process to include zlib support. Once the configuration is complete, you can proceed with the usual make and make install commands to build and install Python.

Option 2: Modifying the Makefile

If you prefer a more manual approach, you can modify the Makefile directly to enable zlib support. Open the Makefile in a text editor and locate the line that starts with “LIBS=”. Add “-lz” at the end of this line to link against the zlib library.

LIBS= -lpthread -ldl  -lutil -lm -lz

Save the Makefile and then proceed with the make and make install commands to build and install Python.

Option 3: Using a package manager

If you are using a package manager to install Python, such as apt or yum, you can specify the zlib package as a dependency. This will ensure that zlib support is included in the Python installation.

sudo apt-get install zlib1g-dev

This command installs the zlib development package, which includes the necessary files for building Python with zlib support. Once the package is installed, you can use the package manager to install Python as usual.

After exploring these three options, it is clear that using the configure script (Option 1) is the most straightforward and recommended approach. It allows for easy customization of the build process and ensures that zlib support is included in the Python installation. However, the other options can be useful in certain scenarios where modifying the Makefile or using a package manager is preferred.

Rate this post

7 Responses

    1. I totally disagree. Option 2 is way more exciting! Why settle for simplicity when you can embrace a challenge? Step out of your comfort zone, my friend, and experience the thrill of pushing your limits. Trust me, its worth it!

  1. Option 3 all the way! Who has time to mess around with configure scripts and Makefiles? Go package manager! 💪🐍

    1. Option 3 is for the lazy ones. Real developers dont rely on package managers to do all the work. Configuring scripts and Makefiles give you control and understanding of your code. Dont be afraid to get your hands dirty and level up your skills! 💪🔧

    1. Option 2 all the way! Life is too short for easy and predictable. Embrace the unknown, take risks, and create memories that will last a lifetime. Dont settle for the ordinary when you can have an extraordinary adventure! Lets go, thrill-seekers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Table of Contents